86% of Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid Vaccine in Clinical Trial

BY THE DAILY EXPOSE ON  •

The FDA granted emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in children aged 12 and over in the USA back on the 10th May 2021. The EMA has recently followed suit, recommending the Pfizer jab should be administered to children aged 12 and over in EU countries.

Because of this there can be no doubt that the MHRA will follow the FDA and EMA’s lead and also grant emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer jab for use in children aged 12 and above.

But are you aware that the clinical trials carried out by Pfizer on children aged 12 – 15 reveal that 86% of children who were given at least one dose of the jab suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to serious?


The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).

That fact sheet contains two tables that detail the alarming rate of side effects and damage experienced by 12 – 15- year-old children who were given at least one dose of the Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” (gene therapy).

The tables shows that 1,127 children were given one dose of the mRNA jab, but only 1,097 children received the second dose. This fact in itself raises questions as to why 30 children did not receive a second dose of the Pfizer jab, and we doubt the answer is pretty.

Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab a shocking 86% experienced an adverse reaction. Of the 1,097 children who received a second dose of the jab a shocking 78.9% experienced an adverse reaction.

Table 6 within the FDA fact sheet shows that 20.3% of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the Pfizer jab experienced fever, meanwhile 39.3% of the 1,097 children who received a second dose experienced fever.

Another 60.1% of the children who received the first dose also experienced fatigue, whilst 66% of those who received a second dose experienced fatigue.

Another 55.3% of the children who received the first dose also experienced a headache, and 64.5% of those who received a second dose also experienced a headache.

27.6% of the children who recieved the first dose also experienced chills, whilst 41.5% of the children who received a second dose experienced chills. 2.8% of the children who received a first dose experienced vomiting, whilst 2.6% of the children who received a second dose experienced vomiting.

The final specific adverse reaction that the FDA list is diarrhoea. Of the 1,127 children who received the first dose 8.0% suffered with diarrhoea. Of the 1,097 children who received a 2nd dose 5.9% experienced diarrhoea.

It’s shocking to find that even after 86% of children reported an adverse reaction after the first dose that the study was allowed to proceed and the same children were given a second dose of the jab.

The FDA document also states that 0.04% suffered an extremely serious adverse reaction but does not go in to detail on the type of reactions that occurred. 0.04% may sound small but lets put this into perspective. In the United Kingdom there are approximately 4 million children aged between 12 – 15-years-old. If every single one of these children were to receive just one dose of the Pfizer mRNA jab then according to the study we can expect to see 1,600 suffer an extremely serious adverse reaction which could include death.

But if this then extends to children under the age of 12 and a similar rate of extremely serious adverse reaction occurs then we can expect to see that number increase to around 5,200.

However we cannot forget that the study shows that 86% of recipients suffered an adverse reaction. This means that if just 12-15-year-old’s are given one dose of the Pfizer jab we can expect to see 3.4 million of them suffer an adverse reaction.



When comparing this rate against the actual risk of children even mildly suffering from the alleged Covid-19 disease we are bewildered at how medicine regulators have concluded that the benefits of these experimental vaccines outweigh the risks.

And these are experimental vaccines, the FDA document even tells the public this in which it states the following –

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

The FDA also confirms in their fact sheet that the Pfizer jab (alongside all other Covid jabs) is still in clinical trials –

‘Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.

They are coming for your children. Your silence and compliance has allowed this to happen. Any rational person, after reading this “fact sheet” from the FDA, would surely find the courage to say “enough is enough”?

Please share this widely so parents across the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States can make an informed decision for their children.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/30/shocking-86-of-children-suffered-an-adverse-reaction-to-the-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-clinical-trial/

_______________________________

If you are looking for solutions (lawyer, form, gathering, action, antidote, treatments, maybe this could help you:
HERE

If you want to fight back better:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/health-freedom/defender-days-sticker-gallery/

Find the others: www.freedomcells.org

www.thegreaterreset.org

If you like our work please consider to donate :

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-58.png

Spike Protein Protocol 

Glutathione (most important for body detoxification) or better
NAC = N-Acetyl-Cysteine 600-750mg (causes the body to produce glutathione itself)
Zinc
Astaxantin 5mg (also improves vision)
Quercetin
vitamin D3
Milk thistle (also liver and stomach protection)
Melatonin 1mg to 10mg (against 5G)
Alternatively CDS/CDL and zeolite

Dr. Zelenko’s Protocol contains Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Zinc, Vitamin D3, and Quercetin.

How to find the truth :

Search engine: www.duckduckgo.com
Videos: www.brandnewtube.com
www.odysee.com
www.bitchute.com
Facebook style: www.gab.com

25 thoughts on “86% of Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid Vaccine in Clinical Trial

  1. so 0.03% have a serious reaction 86% are mildly inconvenienced. I would like to thank you for not making any attempt to disguise this blatant propaganda piece as a serious review of data.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That still sounds higher than their risk of “serious” reaction to a natural infection. Do you have that # for otherwise healthy 12-15 cohort?

      Like

    2. As parents, we are supposed to protect our children from harm. Keeping in mind that the adverse reactions are more than just a sore arm, to inject any child with any experimental drug and risk any type of injury is abhorrent to my way of thinking.
      This is actually what the Nazi doctors did to the imprisoned children during WWII.
      As parents, our first duty is to love our children, it is not, to allow them to be used as a commodity in a drug experiment.
      This sounds harsh. I don’t mean to be harsh, this is just how I see the situation at this moment in time.

      Like

  2. Junk. Do not listen to this garbage. Listen to those who know what the statistics mean and can interpret them into an action plan. Do you only look at the numbers when you make a consequential decision. To what extent did you examine the “facts” when you last bought a home or rented an apartment, versus a bad situation developing from your decision.

    Like

  3. This is absolutely stupid. You realize you’re using common reactions to ALL vaccines as a scare tactic? I’m trying to find real advice on if I should or should not get myself and kids the vaccine and this is the bs I find. BEWARE 86% get a sore arm! Stf up can I find some real news and hyped up propaganda

    Like

    1. If you have to make a decision other than no then you’re already deceived. Apparently you have drunk the koolaide like the rest.

      Like

    2. Hell No! If you don’t believe their advice watch the doctors, nurses, virologist, immunologist, pharmacologist, people that worked for big pharma companies, even the maker of mrna that says not for human use. You can find all of them on Rumble on Stew Peter’s. Alex Jones on Odysee. Project Veritas and more. Don’t poison yourself or your family.

      Like

  4. So the powers that are telling you what you should do with your kids’ health openly admit they’re doing an experiment with no long term studies and you still are not one bit concerned?

    It is quite sad how effective brainwashing by the ultra rich politicians and their supporters is that it has led to a distrust of Nature’s creation and faith in a group of elite psychopaths that have a long history of doing everything in their power to destroy our earth in a myriad of ways.

    Like

  5. You have got to be kidding!! Children are Not homes n rental property. We only get one body n it could be a very tormented existence if it goes wrong from taking something that very well is toxic into our or our children’s bodies!! These are facts!! Check VAERS Although they are way under reporting & taking down the numbers of effected people. This info is being hidden from the public because they have a depopulation agenda. So wake up!! Or maybe you are one of the lying paid fact checkers.

    Like

  6. Mostly mild reactions. Screen obese kids to see if they have heart problems and should not be vaccinated. Alternative of death is a real reason to proceed with cautions in place.

    Like

  7. What INFORMED DECISION?

    The world is being run by evil, and people are looking at statistics? See what your religion says about evil. You are suppose to destroy evil. Instead people are making “”INFORMED DECISION”” on whether or not to give demon recommended poison for their children. No one is to protect or give goods, or services or honor or attention to any demonic parasitic globalist. Instead, people CENSOR anyone telling the truth. WHY? Because it is the wish of the parasitic globalists that their evil not see the light of day. And people all over the world are honoring their wishes. Shame on all of you for hiding the truth, and not destroying evil. If you are not sure who they are here is a hint:

    “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the KINGDOM OF GOD.”

    Like

  8. Don’t listen to the pro vaxxers bashing this article. What the author fails to discuss is the whole topic of mRNA vaccines and how it’s a new vaccine technology with no approval by the FDA and we’re basically all human guinea pigs for their experiment. There hasn’t been enough clinical studies to show this won’t be catastrophic to our immune systems, and many physicians have voiced this concern but are intentionally ignored and never get heard. They’ll tell you in detail how this may cause much more harm than good rather than pacify you by telling you something dumb like “trust the science”. What science exactly? That’s how dumb they think we all are.

    Like

    1. Exactly! In 18 months I have personally known 1 person to get the virus (probably just the flu). An 80 yr old lady who had been vaccinated. She is fine.

      Like

    2. mRNA vaccines have been around since the 90’s. They just never got the funding to take off from big pharma. But over the years they’ve been tested for various diseases and have actually been found to be SAFER than conventional vaccines.

      Like

  9. So the 86% number is obviously being used as a scare tactic for the hysterical. 0.03% adverse reactions is the real number. The question no one is asking is why do we need to vaccinate kids when their infection/symptomatic rate is so low? If the bulk of the adult population is vaccinated, herd immunity will be achieved without having to vaccinate kids. The lack of long term data for kids (who have long lives ahead of them) is the most concerning, especially given their risk of serious infection is low. That’s the real story.

    Like

  10. “The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).”

    Literally links to a site that doesn’t have pages at all, let alone a page 25. I’ve seen people lie pretty hard, but leave it to a plague rat personal blog to do it so blatantly XD

    Like

  11. Come on here for Real News and you are likely to be disappointed. It’s either “trust the science” or “don’t trust the government” which neither side understands what they are saying. Personally, I just can’t find a real reason to not give my kid the vaccine. This article is clearly scare tactics and Anecdotal evidence with a very misleading headline. It makes you wonder what the author thinks of his audience. They must know that their base doesn’t read pass the headlines. This is so far the most negative thing I could find besides the Myocarditis. Reddit has some bogus headlines and VAERS cannot be fully trusted, so where does that leave parents? The same place it left you when you were making the decision for yourself, just do what you think is best for you and your family and shut up about it. How hard is that?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: