57 Top Scientists and Doctors: Stop All Covid Vaccinations

9 mai 2021

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
Image: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH is one of the experts. Press photo

A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors, and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current Covid-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs.

This article was previously published on En-volve.com (feel free to share this report)

There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.

You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.

There are still far too many unanswered questions regarding the Covid-19 vaccines’ safety, efficacy, and necessity. This study is a bombshell that should be heard by everyone, regardless of their views on vaccines. There aren’t nearly enough citizens who are asking questions. Most people simply follow the orders of world governments, as if they have earned our complete trust. They haven’t done so. This manuscript is a step forward in terms of accountability and the free flow of information on this crucial subject. Please take the time to read it and share it widely.


SARS-CoV-2 mass vaccination: Urgent questions on vaccine safety that demand answers from international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers

Roxana Bruno1, Peter McCullough2, Teresa Forcades i Vila3, Alexandra Henrion-Caude4, Teresa García-Gasca5, Galina P. Zaitzeva6, Sally Priester7, María J. Martínez Albarracín8, Alejandro Sousa-Escandon9, Fernando López Mirones10, Bartomeu Payeras Cifre11, Almudena Zaragoza Velilla10, Leopoldo M. Borini1, Mario Mas1, Ramiro Salazar1, Edgardo Schinder1, Eduardo A Yahbes1, Marcela Witt1, Mariana Salmeron1, Patricia Fernández1, Miriam M. Marchesini1, Alberto J. Kajihara1, Marisol V. de la Riva1, Patricia J. Chimeno1, Paola A. Grellet1, Matelda Lisdero1, Pamela Mas1, Abelardo J. Gatica Baudo12, Elisabeth Retamoza12, Oscar Botta13, Chinda C. Brandolino13, Javier Sciuto14, Mario Cabrera Avivar14, Mauricio Castillo15, Patricio Villarroel15, Emilia P. Poblete Rojas15, Bárbara Aguayo15, Dan I. Macías Flores15, Jose V. Rossell16, Julio C. Sarmiento17, Victor Andrade-Sotomayor17, Wilfredo R. Stokes Baltazar18, Virna Cedeño Escobar19, Ulises Arrúa20, Atilio Farina del Río21, Tatiana Campos Esquivel22, Patricia Callisperis23, María Eugenia Barrientos24, Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse5,*

1Epidemiólogos Argentinos Metadisciplinarios. República Argentina.
2Baylor University Medical Center. Dallas, Texas, USA.
3Monestir de Sant Benet de Montserrat, Montserrat, Spain
4INSERM U781 Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Cité, Institut Imagine, Paris, France.
5School of Natural Sciences. Autonomous University of Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
6Retired Professor of Medical Immunology. Universidad de Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
7Médicos por la Verdad Puerto Rico. Ashford Medical Center. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
8Retired Professor of Clinical Diagnostic Processes. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
9Urologist Hospital Comarcal de Monforte, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
10Biólogos por la Verdad, Spain.
11Retired Biologist. University of Barcelona. Specialized in Microbiology. Barcelona, Spain.
12Center for Integrative Medicine MICAEL (Medicina Integrativa Centro Antroposófico Educando en Libertad). Mendoza, República Argentina.
13Médicos por la Verdad Argentina. República Argentina. ´
14Médicos por la Verdad Uruguay. República Oriental del Uruguay.
15Médicos por la Libertad Chile. República de Chile.
16Physician, orthopedic specialist. República de Chile.
17Médicos por la Verdad Perú. República del Perú.
18Médicos por la Verdad Guatemala. República de Guatemala.
19Concepto Azul S.A. Ecuador.
20Médicos por la Verdad Brasil. Brasil.
21Médicos por la Verdad Paraguay.
22Médicos por la Costa Rica.
23Médicos por la Verdad Bolivia.
24Médicos por la Verdad El Salvador.
* Correspondence: Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse, karina.acevedo.whitehouse@uaq.mx

Abstract

Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, the race for testing new platforms designed to confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2, has been rampant and unprecedented, leading to emergency authorization of various vaccines. Despite progress on early multidrug therapy for COVID-19 patients, the current mandate is to immunize the world population as quickly as possible. The lack of thorough testing in animals prior to clinical trials, and authorization based on safety data generated during trials that lasted less than 3.5 months, raise questions regarding the safety of these vaccines. The recently identified role of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein Spike for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce the production of Spike glycoprotein in the recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects, and the wide range of types of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement, Th2-immunopathology, autoimmunity, and immune evasion, there is a need for a better understanding of the benefits and risks of mass vaccination, particularly in the groups that were excluded in the clinical trials. Despite calls for caution, the risks of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities. We appeal to the need for a pluralistic dialogue in the context of health policies, emphasizing critical questions that require urgent answers if we wish to avoid a global erosion of public confidence in science and public health.

Introduction

Since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic in March 2020, over 150 million cases and 3 million deaths have been reported worldwide. Despite progress on early ambulatory, multidrug-therapy for high-risk patients, resulting in 85% reductions in COVID-19 hospitalization and death [1], the current paradigm for control is mass-vaccination. While we recognize the effort involved in development, production and emergency authorization of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we are concerned that risks have been minimized or ignored by health organizations and government authorities, despite calls for caution [2-8].

Vaccines for other coronaviruses have never been approved for humans, and data generated in the development of coronavirus vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies show that they may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Th2 immunopathology, regardless of the vaccine platform and delivery method [9-11]. Vaccine-driven disease enhancement in animals vaccinated against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV is known to occur following viral challenge, and has been attributed to immune complexes and Fc-mediated viral capture by macrophages, which augment T-cell activation and inflammation [11-13].

In March 2020, vaccine immunologists and coronavirus experts assessed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine risks based on SARS-CoV-vaccine trials in animal models. The expert group concluded that ADE and immunopathology were a real concern, but stated that their risk was insufficient to delay clinical trials, although continued monitoring would be necessary [14]. While there is no clear evidence of the occurrence of ADE and vaccine-related immunopathology in volunteers immunized with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [15], safety trials to date have not specifically addressed these serious adverse effects (SAE). Given that the follow-up of volunteers did not exceed 2-3.5 months after the second dose [16-19], it is unlikely such SAE would have been observed. Despite92 errors in reporting, it cannot be ignored that even accounting for the number of vaccines administered, according to the US Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System (VAERS), the number of deaths per million vaccine doses administered has increased more than 10-fold. We believe there is an urgent need for open scientific dialogue on vaccine safety in the context of large-scale immunization. In this paper, we describe some of the risks of mass vaccination in the context of phase 3 trial exclusion criteria and discuss the SAE reported in national and regional adverse effect registration systems. We highlight unanswered questions and draw attention to the need for a more cautious approach to mass vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 phase 3 trial exclusion criteria

With few exceptions, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials excluded the elderly [16-19], making it impossible to identify the occurrence of post-vaccination eosinophilia and enhanced inflammation in elderly people. Studies of SARS-CoV vaccines showed that immunized elderly mice were at particularly high risk of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology [9,20]. Despite this evidence and the extremely limited data on safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the elderly, mass-vaccination campaigns have focused on this age group from the start. Most trials also excluded pregnant and lactating volunteers, as well as those with chronic and serious conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis C, autoimmunity, coagulopathies, cancer, and immune suppression [16-29], although these recipients are now being offered the vaccine under the premise of safety.

Another criterion for exclusion from nearly all trials was prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2. This is unfortunate as it denied the opportunity of obtaining extremely relevant information concerning post-vaccination ADE in people that already have anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies. To the best of our knowledge, ADE is not being monitored systematically for any age or medical condition group currently being administered the vaccine. Moreover, despite a substantial proportion of the population already having antibodies [21], tests to determine SARS-CoV-2-antibody status prior to administration of the vaccine are not conducted routinely.

Will serious adverse effects from the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines go unnoticed?

COVID-19 encompasses a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from very mild to severe pulmonary pathology and fatal multi-organ disease with inflammatory, cardiovascular, and blood coagulation dysregulation [22-24]. In this sense, cases of vaccine-related ADE or immunopathology would be clinically-indistinguishable from severe COVID-19 [25]. Furthermore, even in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, Spike glycoprotein alone causes endothelial damage and hypertension in vitro and in vivo in Syrian hamsters by down-regulating angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and impairing mitochondrial function [26]. Although these findings need to be confirmed in humans, the implications of this finding are staggering, as all vaccines authorized for emergency use are based on the delivery or induction of Spike glycoprotein synthesis. In the case of mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectorized vaccines, not a single study has examined the duration of Spike production in humans following vaccination. Under the cautionary principle, it is parsimonious to consider vaccine-induced Spike synthesis could cause clinical signs of severe COVID-19, and erroneously be counted as new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections. If so, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this question. There is already non-causal evidence of temporary or sustained increases138 in COVID-19 deaths following vaccination in some countries (Fig. 1) and in light of Spike’s pathogenicity, these deaths must be studied in depth to determine whether they are related to vaccination.

Unanticipated adverse reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Another critical issue to consider given the global scale of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is autoimmunity. SARS-CoV-2 has numerous immunogenic proteins, and all but one of its immunogenic epitopes have similarities to human proteins [27]. These may act as a source of antigens, leading to autoimmunity [28]. While it is true that the same effects could be observed during natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, vaccination is intended for most of the world population, while it is estimated that only 10% of the world population has been infected by SARS-CoV-2, according to Dr. Michael Ryan, head of emergencies at the World Health Organization. We have been unable to find evidence that any of the currently authorized vaccines screened and excluded homologous immunogenic epitopes to avoid potential autoimmunity due to pathogenic priming.

Some adverse reactions, including blood-clotting disorders, have already been reported in healthy and young vaccinated people. These cases led to the suspension or cancellation of the use of adenoviral vectorized ChAdOx1-nCov-19 and Janssen vaccinesin some countries. It has now been proposed that vaccination with ChAdOx1-nCov-19 can result in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against Platelet factor-4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [29]. Unfortunately, the risk was overlooked when authorizing these vaccines, although adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia has been known for more than a decade, and has been a consistent event with adenoviral vectors [30]. The risk of VITT would presumably be higher in those already at risk of blood clots, including women who use oral contraceptives [31], making it imperative for clinicians to advise their patients accordingly.

At the population level, there could also be vaccine-related impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a fast-evolving RNA virus that has so far produced more than 40,000 variants [32,33] some of which affect the antigenic domain of Spike glycoprotein [34,35]. Given the high mutation rates, vaccine-induced synthesis of high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike antibodies could theoretically lead to suboptimal responses against subsequent infections by other variants in vaccinated individuals [36], a phenomenon known as “original antigenic sin” [37] or antigenic priming [38]. It is unknown to what extent mutations that affect SARS-CoV-2 antigenicity will become fixed during viral evolution [39], but vaccines could plausibly act as selective forces driving variants with higher infectivity or transmissibility. Considering the high similarity between known SARS-CoV-2 variants, this scenario is unlikely [32,34] but if future variants were to differ more in key epitopes, the global vaccination strategy might have helped shape an even more dangerous virus. This risk has recently been brought to the attention of the WHO as an open letter [40].

Discussion

The risks outlined here are a major obstacle to continuing global SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Evidence on the safety of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is needed before exposing more people to the184 risk of these experiments, since releasing a candidate vaccine without time to fully understand the resulting impact on health could lead to an exacerbation of the current global crisis [41]. Risk-stratification of vaccine recipients is essential. According to the UK government, people below 60 years of age have an extremely low risk of dying from COVID-191 187 . However, according to Eudravigillance, most of the serious adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination occur in people aged 18-64. Of particular concern is the planned vaccination schedule for children aged 6 years and older in the United States and the UK. Dr. Anthony Fauci recently anticipated that teenagers across the country will be vaccinated in the autumn and younger children in early 2022, and the UK is awaiting trial results to commence vaccination of 11 million children under 18. There is a lack of scientific justification for subjecting healthy children to experimental vaccines, given that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that they have a 99.997% survival rate if infected with SARS-CoV-2. Not only is COVID-19 irrelevant as a threat to this age group, but there is no reliable evidence to support vaccine efficacy or effectiveness in this population or to rule out harmful side effects of these experimental vaccines. In this sense, when physicians advise patients on the elective administration of COVID-19 vaccination, there is a great need to better understand the benefits and risk of administration, particularly in understudied groups.

In conclusion, in the context of the rushed emergency-use-authorization of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and the current gaps in our understanding of their safety, the following questions must be raised:

  • Is it known whether cross-reactive antibodies from previous coronavirus infections or vaccine206 induced antibodies may influence the risk of unintended pathogenesis following vaccination with COVID-19?
  • Has the specific risk of ADE, immunopathology, autoimmunity, and serious adverse reactions been clearly disclosed to vaccine recipients to meet the medical ethics standard of patient understanding for informed consent? If not, what are the reasons, and how could it be implemented?
  • What is the rationale for administering the vaccine to every individual when the risk of dying from COVID-19 is not equal across age groups and clinical conditions and when the phase 3 trials excluded the elderly, children and frequent specific conditions?
  • What are the legal rights of patients if they are harmed by a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine? Who will cover the costs of medical treatment? If claims were to be settled with public money, has the public been made aware that the vaccine manufacturers have been granted immunity, and their responsibility to compensate those harmed by the vaccine has been transferred to the tax-payers?

In the context of these concerns, we propose halting mass-vaccination and opening an urgent pluralistic, critical, and scientifically-based dialogue on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among scientists, medical doctors, international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments, and vaccine developers. This is the only way to bridge the current gap between scientific evidence and public health policy regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We are convinced that humanity deserves a deeper understanding of the risks than what is currently touted as the official position. An open scientific dialogue is urgent and indispensable to avoid erosion of public confidence in science and public health and to ensure that the WHO and national health authorities protect the interests of humanity during the current pandemic. Returning public health policy to evidence-based medicine, relying on a careful evaluation of the relevant scientific research, is urgent. It is imperative to follow the science.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-reported-sars-cov-2-deaths-in-england/covid-19-confirmed-deaths-in-england-report

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Read more ….

https://newsvoice.se/2021/05/57-scientists-study-covid-vaccinations/

If you like our work, please consider to donate:

53 thoughts on “57 Top Scientists and Doctors: Stop All Covid Vaccinations

  1. First several school closed in the name of polluted atmosphere which was real ,people were suggested to were doublemask when less oxygen is outside ,there was less then 21%of oxygen ,that make some people serious to wear mask even in home .result lack of oxygen..

    Like

  2. We are being forced at mercy to take the vaccine or we will be fired II go against the vaccine the vaccine what is there that we can do

    Like

    1. Lawsuits. And please be aware that we need to “teach the court” while prosecuting our lawsuits. There is so much mis- and disinformation on the subject.

      For instance, how many are aware of the distinctions between SARSCoV2 vs COVID-19? That is critical as it has been affecting our public policies. In addition, what about natural immunity, in which peer-reviewed articles are now supporting “Immunology 101″…better resistance. And the variants are, excuse me, almost invariably weaker– transmission is easier with a weaker virus (too much to explain that seemingly contradictory statment here). The mortality (death) rates are already showing this to be true. Here’s one example of misleading and fearmongering: You can look up this headline last month, goes something like “Nine vaccinated NY Yankees test positive for Covid”. First error, Covid is diagnosed, not tested; they were tested for the virus (think of HIV is to AIDS and SARS2 is to COVID). They did NOT have COVID because none were sick, so the vaccine was doing what it was supposed to do (leaving the vax problems discussed herein aside). I could go on, but you get the picture.

      [I do make mistakes, but at the risk of sounding pretentious, I have 2 Covid treatment patents pending and a recently FDA approved cancer treatment vaccine going into patients at a NCI-Designated Cancer Center (for adenocarcinomas; about 45% of all cancers)].

      Like

    2. @ Sandra McKenney, Didn’t mean for it to be “Anonymous” in post below (or above?), but I can’t seem to repair this. But its McihaelB

      Like

  3. The one statement, that proves this situation to harm and kill with a manufactored virus is true, is the fact that those responsible have covered their own backsides so to speak and protected the manufactorers of these vaccines and drugs, taking away their CLEAR RESPONSIBILITY, and to add INSULT TO INJURY they have passed the costs of it all to the electorate who are like me n you, the ones who are catching it and losing friends and loved ones from it, that alone shows only corruption at very high levels of society, it makes people guilty of either pre meditated murder or just plain eugenics.

    In my opinion, these individuals should be subjected to international Law, the full weight of it in human rights courts to answer for their clear violations, and also should stand trial for high treason in their respective countries

    Like

      1. Would like to have read this and understood it better with explanations to medical terms for those of us who do not have a medical degree. I am college degreed but am trying to decide if I will get the vaccine or not as many of my friends and family and neighbors have contracted it, and I have personally known 10 who have died from it. I am a researcher, but I found this only written for the medically knowledgeable.

        Like

      2. Note that those scientists have their actual, real names at the top of the paper, while “Chad” here is hiding behind an Internet pseudonym. (Even if his name is, in fact, Chad, what’s his last name?)

        Just saying.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I actually looked up the credentials on some of them.. They are what they say they are….at least these were. If people want to take it, I’m fine with that. But, If I do not want to take an experimental vaccine, I should be able to do that too. What makes un-vaccinated people a risk to the vaccinated anyway? Vaccinated people can transmit the new Delta Variant just like the un-vaccinated…no difference. And, they can get the Delta Variant and they can die from the Delta Variant. So now, I don’t see the benefits of taking it outweighing the dangers of taking it. I feel like this is a personal choice.

    Like

    1. Israel has Led the world in number of vaccinations and look what’s going on now ,a huge surge in new cases and it’s not even the not even the Delta variant what does that tell you. I’m just pissed because I went and got vaccinated before Is assessing any risks and now IFind out that in a couple months I could get sick and die from my immune system being compromised from the Vaccine that wasn’t tested properly.

      Like

      1. I was just naive and didn’t think the government would be this grossly negligent towards its citizens. Somebody should have been obligated to at least tell people what they’re risking before sticking that needle in their arm

        Like

      2. I read that you can help detox with N.A.C., nano carbon activated charcoal, iodine, zinc, quercetin and pyrroloquimolune quinine.

        Like

    2. What makes unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people is this.
      A US vet died because he waited 7 hours in an ER for a bed because the hospital was at capacity with Covid patients. 90% were unvaccinated. They called looking for a hospital with a bed that could take him and give him the 30 minute procedure that would have saved his life. By the time they found one some 4 hours away it was too late. He died on the way there. He risked his love fe to serve our country in Afghanistan but died in his own country because too many people aren’t willing to take a risk to keep the hospitals from overflowing. Killed by the very people he fought to protect. They weren’t willing to protect him.

      Like

      1. these stories are not true. The cdc stopped the reporting of vaxed patients being in hospitals as of May 1st. My rn wife will tell you that most of the icu patients are older vaxed people now.

        Like

      2. Clarissa, is that a hearsay or you were a case manager for that patient?? Or. better yet, you heard it from the news, CNN perhaps?

        Like

      3. You do realize that the wait time for most ERs is approximately 4-7 hours even before the COVID virus. 6 years ago I almost died in the Northwest Houston hospital ER waiting room after waiting 7 hours to be seen and I was considered a priority! I guarantee you that most people you ask will have the same experience. So pleeeaaase spare us the pity story. Our vets are one of our most prized possessions and deserve every help possible but it makes me sick to see them used as pawns to spread fear into the very people they served to protect!!

        Like

      4. Clarisa, you have misplaced anger on the unvaccinated when the real problem was that our government never allowed information to come out about drugs and vitamins that could be taken early to prevent the worst outcomes of Covid-19 and keep everyone out of the hospital. Examples: Vitamin D, get your blood serum vitamin d level to 50 ng/ml. Nobody is in the ICU at this lever. 80% vitamin D deficient in ICU. An ivermectin protocol right after testing positive for Covid-19 helped clear out hospitals in Mexico in Jan 2021. Then same thing happened in states in India that chose to use it.this summer. US government and big pharma have to make sure no early treatments are known to protect their emergency Use authorization for vaccines. It is illegal if a safe effective alternative exists. The overrun hospitals and deaths are good for vaccine campaign. Just like your misplaced anger shows.

        Like

      5. Maybe if they started treating people ..for COVID Ivermectin works and is safer ..why won’t they even study and see if it works..all the people those drs. cured with ivermectin we’re watched by their doctors so let’s see the test results how are those people today.?.are they dead.?.let us know ..but the money mongers don’t care about proof or truth ..they only care about power and money ..let’s get some data on ivermectin to people who you can trust

        Like

      6. Clarissa
        The man died because no one at the hospital new how to treat COVID ..has nothing to do with a vaccine..OK

        Like

      7. this is a complete lie. Please go down to your hospital and count the patients holding up beds with covid…. physically do it, not by your news outlet. You will find a very different story

        Like

  5. Many areas of science, including epidemiology and other health sciences, involve both inherent randomness (aleatory variations) as well as uncertainties owing to limited data and knowledge (leading also to epistemic variations … a fancy term for differing views among the relevant informed technical communities [ITCs] of experts). How to rationally accommodate both sources of variation into properly exhaustive scientific studies that accurately convey the uncertainties of the ITC and can be applied in a robust policy framework tied explicitly to risk and safety metrics is well known from other regulated scientific fields (e.g., design of nuclear facilities for natural hazards considering the considerable randomness in hazardous events and uncertainties among the earth scientists and engineers).

    Unfortunately, the process of pursuing multiple expert inputs needed to reasonably anticipate all possible COVID vaccine failure modes (side effects, inefficacies, etc.) has apparently been (and is yet being) thrown out the window in the case of governmental/political/social entities exercising their power (and views in favor of what I’ll call “power/forced-consensus science”) in imposing COVID-19 mandates, their risk-mitigation measures and their related (and consequentially flawed) policies.

    What we have seen occur in relationship to many COVID policies looks to definitely not be the rational pursuit of science and the proper application of science in policy making.

    The proper analysis, using many experts to develop the epistemic uncertainties, can certainly be done … and the article above suggests it should/must be done to truly manage public risk and safety properly and rationally. The key questions are: when will it be done?; and how severe will the societal cost become? …from application of (faux/forced) science and policy and power versus true science, which has to involve the freedom of exchange of informed views among the relevant ITCs in order to accurately assess uncertainties and account for these in truly rational and beneficial policy.

    Like

  6. What it all boils down to is choice. You can believe whatever science you like, but when you take away a persons choice as to what they put in their body….you have medical tyranny. What’s next? Medical sterilization? For the greater good nobody can have children for the next three decades? That’s called communism in case you’re not sure. Can it happen? Damn right it can….and already has!

    Like

  7. This is a very interesting and I believe factual report. But, what if this worldwide rush to vaccinate everyone is sinister and being done for population control which has been eluded to my many?

    Like

    1. The virus has killed 664,935 Americans so far .This is 1 out of every 500 people in the USA. The vaccines markedly reduce being confined in a hospital when sick with covid-19 and reduces chance of dying to 0.003% of vaccinated people or 3 out of every 100,000. PS Perhaps you mean “alluded” (referenced) instead of “eluded” (avoided)

      Like

  8. I have not really believed in this pandemic from the beginning. I also have been aware for years that main stream media lies and I do not watch the news. I had that confirmed by someone who is in that biz. I will not take any vaccination as it is not necessary. Our immune systems know what to do far better. Plus I have no trust in the current administration and it is very easy to figure out their agenda.I love my country and hope my fellow Americans wake up soon! God Bless You All. R. A. Stephens

    Like

    1. The problem I have is the illegals coming across the border are exempt as well as government employees as well as all coming from Afghanistan.

      Like

    2. Dear Mr. Stephens, if you believe “Our immune systems know what to do far better”, then I invite you to get infected by the Ebola virus just to test your “theory”!

      Like

  9. King Kong beat his chest, RCs strike their breast and those who hum deeply ..?. Children have a big thymus and that is a difference for senior adult death rates being far more. Also, there is a pandemic in low human zinc and vitaminD levels…ethnic people in a new latitude may have D shortages…being cold…cold feet …cold nose …T cells retreat from nose …zinc stops replication but get it in the cell to work so quercitin will do it so the invader cannot replcate…Hippocrates said to do no harm and the fulcrum of his medical chest …elderberry…stops the spikes locking check out liqourice and dandylion..be careful and see a doctor for advice here…but how many have any training here …so big issue is reductionism we need wholism to cope with a multi-variate reality…medicine now underpinned by massive capitalistic philosophies and the attendant power … there is no relief here all the powerful die too.. life is short nasty and brutish…why do we make it worse? We are in world war3…the eastern front is climate change …so seawater killed the triffids and the cold killed the Martians…a scream sorted the quiet place…our ammunition is zinc in the cells, quercitin to get it there (or Trumpo’s hydroxy)…and a spike anti lock(dock)like elderberry -let the smart(don’t need a brain) bastards slide off… keep the thymus active for T cells…big picture is that there should be more than two pronged solutions…a vaccine not properly manipulated can become a black hole with a vortex to bring an end to humanity…if your are in the media bubble this will not dock witb your ACE2 receptor…what is truth? After delta…omega and more vaccines so more aluminium so more alzeimher’s..reductionism?!?!

    Like

  10. We have no one to share it with. They’ve all been vaxxed and proud of it. We are left to pick up the pieces of their health in coming months/years.

    Like

  11. I got the Pfizer covid vaccine number 2 and 2 Days later I have the covid infection. That seems curious to me and wondering if there is any connection between getting the vaccine and getting the covid infection. What do you all think?

    Like

    1. my friend posted this and so i stand by her Of all the vaccines I have taken in my life like Tetanus shots, measles, mumps, polio, meningitis, TB shots, etc… Never have I heard so many lies and deceptions over a vaccine that says I have to wear a mask and socially distance even when fully vaccinated, and that I could still contract or spread the virus even after being fully vaccinated.
      Never had to get tested when I was perfectly healthy without any symptoms whatsoever.
      Never been bribed by the establishments to take the vaccine in order to win a holiday and/or cash prizes – tickets to the football or earn frequent flyer points.
      I never had to worry about cardiac issues, neurological disorders, blood clots and sadly more!
      Didn’t even have to worry about death.
      Never was I ever THREATENED by the use of FORCE by the Government, Employers, Police force, and Military for a vaccine as seen here in Canada and o/s.
      I was never judged by my friends or relatives if I didn’t take it. I was never discriminated against for travel or other regular services to a point where I could not buy or sell without it.
      The vaccines I have listed above never told me I was a bad person for not taking them or for even taking them for that matter.
      I have never seen a vaccine that threatened the relationship between my family members and/or close friends to a point of destroying my relationships with them ever.
      Never have I seen it used for political gain. Never seen a vaccine needing 24/7 mass media advertising and promotion on every media outlet known to man.
      Then there’s mixing and matching different vaccine brands and being told it’s okay to do it one day and then told the next day to not do it.
      I have never seen a vaccine threaten someone’s livelihood, as well as wipe out their jobs. I have never seen a vaccine that allows a 12-year-old child’s consent to supersede their parent’s consent (that one alone blows me away).
      Finally, after all the vaccines (jab, shots) I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one that discriminates, divides, and judges a society. So much information is censored, deleted, and removed from the internet and mainstream media!
      So many doctors, health care professionals, police and scientists are censored and forbidden to speak out or ask legitimate questions when what is being allowed or not allowed does not make sense!
      Particularly when it comes from mainstream media. I have never known a vaccine that has made all the Pharmaceutical companies that manufacture it exempt from liability if it kills everyone to a point where no life insurance will cover it!
      This is one powerful vaccine guys! It does all these things above that I have mentioned and yet….
      It does NOT do the ONE thing it is supposed to do- which is…?
      FIGHT OFF THIS PANDEMIC!
      Copied from a friend. Please feel free to do the same if drawn to do so.

      Like

  12. Thank God there are people in this Country that are honest and Educated and willing to seek the truth and push back this evil attempt to take our freedoms away!!!I was in the Medical field for 40 years and I am appalled with the disrespect of our rights of choice, protecting our future generations and safety for our Senior Society!!
    This whole agenda. Is not a protection of our G O D given rights in the Constitution!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: