I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, COVID-19 Is Fake, Wake Up America!

**** Warning, after unsuccessful searches lately on the DR Dereck Knauss identity, it is possible that the links have been removed to discredit the Dr. or simply that he does not exist. Dr. Michel Chossudovsky is a real doctor, so the 2nd part is verified and verifiable.****

The following statements by Dr. Derick Knauss on the identity of the virus and on the failures of the PCR test are corroborated by numerous scientific studies including the WHO. See the text by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky at the foot of Dr. Knauss’ article


I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.

What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test.

We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.

The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died.

I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample,

I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.

With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.

So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.

Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical lab specialist focussing on virology and immunology. He is based in Southern California


“False Positives” and the Identification of the Virus

Excerpt from Prof. Michel Chossudovsky’s E-Book

The 2020 Worldwide Corona Crisis: Destroyig Civil Society, Engineered Economic Depression, Global Coup d’État and the “Great Reset”

Global Research E-Book, Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

While SARS-CoV-2 –namely the the virus which is said to cause COVID-19 (categorized as a disease), was isolated in a laboratory test in January 2020, the RT-PCR test does not identify/ detect the virus. What it detects are fragments of viri. According to renowned Swiss immunologist Dr B. Stadler

So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].

The Question is Positive for What?? The PCR test does not detect the identity of the virus, According to Dr. Pascal Sacré,

these tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.

In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to errors, sterility errors and contamination.

Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability]

The media frighten everyone with new positive PCR tests, without any nuance or context, wrongly assimilating this information with a second wave of COVID-19.The PCR Test does not Identify the Virus: Covid “False Positives” Used to Justify the Lockdown and Closure of the National Economy.

While the RT-PCR test was never intended to identify the virus, it nonetheless constitutes from the very outset the cornerstone of the official estimates of Covid-19 “positives”.

WHY then was it adopted??

The Controversial Drosten RT-PCR Study

F. William Engdahl in a recent article documents how the RT-PCR Test was instated by the WHO at the outset, despite its obvious shortcomings in identifying the 2019-nCoV. The scandal takes its roots in Germany involving “a professor at the heart of Angela Merkel’s corona advisory group”:

On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital, [together]  with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study entitled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020).

While Drosten et al’s Eurosurveillance article (undertaken in liaison with the WHO) confirmed that “several viral genome sequences had been released”, in the case of 2019-nCoV, however, “virus isolates or samples from infected patients were not available … “:

“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].

 We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”  (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).

What this (erroneous) statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “validation” would be enabled by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”

The recommendations of the Drosten study (supported and financed by the Gates Foundation) pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test applied to 2019-nCoV were then transmitted to the WHO. They were subsequently endorsed by the Director General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. The identity of the virus was not required.

The Drosten et al article pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test Worldwide (under WHO guidance) was challenged in a November 27, 2020 study by a  group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists et al. “Their careful analysis of the original [Drosten] piece is damning. …They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test” (Engdahl, December, 2020).  

The results of the PCR Test applied to SARS-2 are blatantly flawed. Drosten et al recommended the use of a 45 amplification threshold cycle (Ct), which was endorsed by the WHO in January 2020.

According to Pieter Borger, et al

The number of amplification cycles [should be] less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles. In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture…(Critique of Drosten Study)

The WHO’s RT-PCR “Retraction” (January 20, 2021)

The RT-PCR test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020, following the recommendations of  the Drosten study quoted above.

One year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO came out with the admission that the PCR test will yield biased results if they are conducted above a certain cycle threshold used for amplification. Below is the text of the WHO’s “retraction”:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation,a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

What this admission of the WHO confirms is that most of the estimates of covid positive under the so-called “Second Wave” (with amplification cycles in excess of 35) are invalid, which means that the lockdown / economic measures which have resulted in social panic, mass poverty and unemployment (allegedly to curtail the spread of the virus) have no justification whatsoever.

Moreover, the WHO is calling for retesting: “a new specimen should be taken and retested…”. That recommendation is pro-forma. I won’t happen. (It is there to sustain the legitimacy of the WHO). Millions of people Worldwide have already been tested:

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%  (Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Craig, Kevin McKernan, et al, Critique of Drosten Study)

At the time of writing (Second Wave) the test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to justifying a partial lockdown with devastating social and economic impacts including the engineered bankruptcy of tourism, air travel and the urban services economy.

Both the WHO and the scientific assessments (quoted above) confirm unequivocally that the tests adopted by governments to justify the destabilization of their national economy are TOTALLY INVALID. Moreover, those PCR tests are not routinely accompanied by a medical diagnosis of the patients who are being tested.


Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

25 thoughts on “I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, COVID-19 Is Fake, Wake Up America!

  1. Thanks for this information, America and the world need to wake up!! Volumes speaking if you can get past -Can’t see the forest for the trees! It’s crazy that so many people are lining up for the Jab. Thanks again for this information I just hope it’s not too late.


  2. these stories are absolutely correct. I am a biologist and Covid is 100% fake. PCR test is complete garbage. The technology was never supposed to be used as a detection for a virus or bacterial, for that matter. The inventor, Dr Mullis died August 2019 so he is not here to defend his earlier statements. You use DNA to identify virus, not PCR. Flu, Pneumonia, ARDS, etc are all the reasons for the respiratory deaths. Very simple. Everyone, wake up and do your own discovery. Govt is taking away your rights, do not let them.
    It is 1776 all over again.


  3. Yes I studied applied biochrmisty at unit, after working, I eventually went on in to engineering because the money was better, but never the less, know enough to know that this entire thing is fake. I have been in hospitals enough lately staying with my mother who passed away to know there is no wards overflowing, infact quiet the opposite, most wards are half full, they are run off their feet die to most the staff being at home or being sent home. Even in ICU listening to conversations about 8 and 9 beds being free but no staff to man them. This is not normal usually around winter time there are no beds free as we usually go through a flue season. On top of that the jiology is complete and utter nonsese. Statements like it doesn’t effect kids when children are more at risk than adults to near enough everything due to a new immune system, and as we know catch everytjing and constantly have runny noses and illnesses. Then there is the actual raw data. Not available to Joe public but my work colleagues daughter works as an analyst for public health England, usually your looking at 40,000+ cases of flue and flue related deaths, again always take heed at the RELATED part. This year it was 248! So flue has disappeared. Also worth noting that people who say they have had it or known people who have had it or died from it…. how donyou know….. have a think…. its because you where told! And I will say lied to! You can’t have something that doesn’t exist. People are being out on antibiotics and told they have covid… you don’t have antibiotics for a viral infection. This happened to my poor mother before she passed away, told she had covid bit was put on iv antibiotics, and other than low electrolytes which she also had to have she was ill with anything else. So it was a bacterial chest infection. We are being played, people, even those that know its complete nonsese are starting to fall in tonline because they want some sort of normality so basically the goverment are winning. We are losing our freedoms, they know we will do as we are told, they can come and shut us down again and push the restrictions further, they know idiots who belive every bit they are fed will act as their eyes and ears and dob in anyone who is seen going about their rightful freedom. Welcome to what Germany wanted but instead of going to war they have used properganda and fear not to mention ridicule to discredit anyone who has the slightest but of critical thinking.

    I mentioned I’d badges/digital passports back in March last year I stated that this lockdown would last alot longer than the 2 weeks, I stated that we will be getting forced to wear masks before rather where a thing, etc… every time I was ridiculed in one form or another… wheres your tin hat, and being lumped in with flat Esther’s and antivaxxers etc. A conspiracy theorists/nut…. it isn’t a theory if its actually happening… but I’m sure people will carry on laughing. The problem you have with evil is it is insidious. Slow and you don’t realise you in it untill you become part of it.


    1. Wow man that message was like music to my ears text me let’s talk 795-806-2534. I’m learning to find people who know the truth because being surrounded by sheep is dumb.


      1. dude…you’re giving your phone number out on the INTERNET! stop and THINK about what you’re doing!

        and if your name is actually chris… don’t complain if a person tries to doxx you someday with this info you’ve willingly put into a public space like a galaxy brained moron.


    1. Call me article writer! I need to know more people like you and increase my circle of knowledge to defeat the dragon 🐉 says:

      Hey please contact me 705-806-2534. I would like to ask you what I should do to help spread your message. Also if you could talk to my friend he says he believes the professionals. You seem rather qualified. I think what he mean right was he takes authority as truth rather than truth as authority. Anyway I’m fed up personally and I keep making friends with losers. I want to make friends with people who know covid is real expand the group and make it my new circle of friends. Also fools listen to numbers not information. So one easy way to convince any idiot is to simply have more numbers than them. They don’t listen to truth only to fear. Good people keep getting teamed up on. But once the good people band together the tyranny ends. 10 anti covers vs 1 pro cover is easy. 10 pro covers vs 1 anti cover is a nightmare. If the good people don’t get together then they will continue to be walked on. This I’m learning slowly. Intelligent people usually don’t make efforts to band together. But that’s when we lose.


    1. To the guy who said we are stupid and horrible people. If he only knew that what he was saying was describing himself maybe we could have a bowl of popcorn to his Hollywood nightmare of a movie. How the idiots call others idiots. And how the horrible people call the good people horrible ls hilarious. But one thing is for sure. The intelligent educate the stupid insult. The stupid pretend to be intelligent but they can’t only fool a dumber person. So it’s like someone running into a wall. Anyway bro I would like to congratulate you on showing everyone here on the first person we should kill if we were starving on a island and needed to eat someone. You are the weakest link and have done a great job of letting yourself known to us.


  4. Thanks for the article, unfortunately those sheep out there in the pasture will not read it or believe It! I read it and say “you are spot on”! Thanks again!


    1. Funny you say that Robert because I just sent this article to a sheeple and they didn’t read it, won’t read it when even if they did wouldn’t believe it. Even if i wanted to say you were wrong I would be wrong in doing so. Just had a nurse practitioner threaten me with violence after saying covid is fake. Lovely system we have here eh? Idiots I tell you they are all idiots. Simply saying covid is fake is like setting a march of haters to your door step. Like the witch hunts all over again. Anyway amazing and I mean amazing article. I learned those who want the truth just get more of it. And those who don’t just get less of it. The smart get smarter and the dumb get dumber what a shame. The more I try to educate others the more I get educated and the less they get educated lol. So I win.


      1. COVID-19 is only a code that doctors or their assistants add to the patient’s record when they come into the hospitals with SARS ( severe acute respiratory syndrome ) caused by cold or flu viruses or breathing in articulates that can cause viral pneumonia. If that patient dies while in the hospital, the check the records and see COVID-19 so that is what they put on the fourth line of the death certificate that some doctor signs. There is another part to the death certificate if they perform an autopsy and find other causes for the death of the body. Then they fill out that form with what they believe was the cause. What I’m trying to say is that there never was a virus named COVID-19.


  5. I am happy to hear this news. However, I do have a few questions.
    PLEASE BE CLEAR!! I am NOT trolling. I am asking the questions that I think would be asked of me if I shared this article.

    1. What did my best friends son die of at 22 years old? He was sick, they say with covid. He recovered then a few weeks later, his bp dropped dangerously low and his organs shut down.

    2. What is it that HQC is working against? Any ol flu or something different?

    3. Why is Robert Redfield, former director of the CDC saying the virus did indeed come from a lab (NOT a bat).

    4. Is there really a virus that escaped the lab (probably from a lab tech) but it isn’t as contagious as they made it sound.

    My inquiring mind wants to know. 👍 Thanks. 😊


    1. 1) Your friend’s son could’ve died of anything at all, and it would still be listed as Covid19 on his DCert. Without any specifics I can only hazard the guess that he may have died of sepsis as the result of a concurrent bacterial or viral infection that unfortunately remained undetected and untreated, and eventually overcame his already overtaxed immune system. My condolences to your best friend, btw.

      2) Zinc is an essential requirement of your immune system. HCQ is a zinc ionophore. It allows that zinc to get inside your cells where it deactivates many viruses, provided that you have enough zinc in your system to begin with. Other zinc ionophores include Ivermectin and Quercetin.

      3) If they say the virus came from a lab rather than a bat, that allows for the possibility that it originated in another geographical location other than China. They can then blame it on any country with such capabilities. The CDC is simply trying to protect China, as they have been doing ever since the start of the original outbreak in Wuhan.

      4) At the present time the we only know that the Wuhan lab was conducting gain of function experiments on known Coronaviruses. SARS CoV2 is a novel (ie; previously unidentified) virus, but shares much of it’s genome with SARS CoV2 (aka “Covid19”) which caused SARS and MERS in humans.

      The fact that the illness we now call ‘Covid19’ first appeared in Wuhan is undisputed. Therefore it’s likely to have been an accidental release than a deliberate one, since the Chinese would (obviously!) have released it elsewhere to avoid any responsibility if that were not the case.

      It IS in fact as contagious as they made it sound, however it is MUCH LESS DEADLY than they would have you believe, as evidenced by the fact that well over 80% of the deaths are in the elderly (over 80’s) and/or immune compromised individuals, diabetics, and/or those already suffering from other serious pulmonary/cardiac conditions.

      Keep in mind that if you already have one virus (such as a common cold or seasonal flu), and then contract another different virus at the same time, that combination is often much more lethal than either one alone.

      I hope that this helps you to understand the severity of this dangerous and disingenous “Covid19” fraud that is currently being perpetrated on the entire world in the name of globalist socialism. Be safe. Fight tyranny! 🙂


      1. Correction.. (sorry ,not sure how to edit my original post)

        4) At the present time we only know that the Wuhan lab was conducting ‘gain of function’ experiments on known Coronaviruses. SARS CoV2 (aka “Covid19”) is a novel (ie: previously unidentified) virus, but shares much of it’s genome with SARS CoV1 which causes SARS and MERS in humans.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: